RE: bug with date_convert_universal()

>>Okay, someone sent me the CMG EMI 3.5 spec.  The only specification
>>of the date format it has is "DDMMYYhhmmss" without further explanation.
>>Since we have evidence of at least one EMI SMSC using 1-based months,
>>shall we assume that they all do?  It would make sense, if the lack of
>>specification means that the date format is intended to be human-readable.


>this is definitively the case. The EMI timestamps are also is in
>LOCAL TIME, not GMT

Yes, that's right. My SMSC works with 1-based months and local time. So it
seems we cannot use date_convert_universal as it is for EMI2 timestamps.

Besides the 1-based/0-based month problem, it assumes GMT timestamps.

Angel Fradejas.