RE: Problem..

That is already done... I'm investigating what the problem is now and
fixing a patch

-----------------
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Phone: +46 18 10 79 50
Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69
Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00

On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Angel Fradejas wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> You have to use
>
>     catch-all = true
>
> in the sms-service declaration for "fslogo" and "fslogo 232" to match, I
> think.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Angel Fradejas.
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]En
> nombre de Bruno David Rodrigues
> Enviado el: jueves 28 de marzo de 2002 20:57
> Para: Stefan Cars
> CC: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
> Asunto: Re: Problem..
>
>
> I've tested it just now and everything works ok.
>
> when I send fslog, I receive a "service unavailable" (the
> reply-couldnotfetch)
> when I send "fslog a", I receive the default service
>
> exactly the reverse of what you say.
>
> Which version are you using ?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Cars" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:24 PM
> Subject: Problem..
>
>
> > I've set this up:
> > group = sms-service
> > keyword = fslogo
> > url = ""
> > accept-x-kannel-headers = 1
> > omit-empty = 1
> > concatenation = 1
> > max-messages = 0
> >
> >
> > When sending "fslogo 232" everything works fine but when sending "fslogo"
> > without anything after it. It doesn't match, it instead goes to the
> > default... Why ? Is this a feature or a bug ?
> >
> > / Stefan
> >
> >
> >
>