RE: [RFC] cgi value = 0 behaviour
Bruno David Simões Rodrigues <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1018439071.31738.15.camel@davi> |
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 09:16, Oded Arbel wrote: > Me like :-) > > what this about coding ? I thought this is how it works now ? to send > unicode, I send coding=3. I meant coding=0 7bits, coding=1 8bits coding=2 ucs2 to match the dcs specs > > -- > Oded Arbel > m-Wise Inc. > [email protected] > > "Sick cultures show a complex of symptoms ... but a *dying* culture > invariably exhibits > personal rudeness. Bad manners. Loss of consideration for others in > minor matters. A loss > of politeness, of gentle manners, is more significant than is a riot." > -- Friday's boss > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruno Rodrigues [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:19 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [RFC] cgi value = 0 behaviour > > > > > > To enable smsbox to accept '0' values in cgi fields, the > > interface should > > change > > and the behaviour will be broken, but I think this should be > > done before we > > launch > > the new stable version (1.2). > > > > May I change the code and documentation now ? > > > > What will be changed is : > > > > mclass: instead of 0-4, will be 0-3 and -1 or not present for default > > > > pid: 0 really means 0 and -1 or not present means not present in pdu > > > > coding: 0-3 means 7bit, 8bit or ucs2 and -1 or not present > > means default > > behaviour of kannel defining it with udh presence > > > > compress: 0,1 forces no-compression (or decompression) or compression, > > and -1 means whatever (I haven't yet done the code to compression) > > > > validity: 0 means error (kannel can't send a message that > > already expired) > > and > > -1/not defined means smsc defaults > > > > deferred: 0 means now, -1 or not defined means now too ;) (or > > when kannel > > wants to send it?) > > > > alt-dcs: 0 means 0x0*, 1 means 0xF*, -1 means let kannel do > > what it wants > > > > So, it's only cgi fields introduced in 1.1.5++ versions. > > > > What do you think ? > > > > > > >