RE: [RFC] cgi value = 0 behaviour

Bruno David Simões Rodrigues <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <1018440104.31738.27.camel@davi>
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 12:49, Andreas Fink wrote:
> >On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 09:16, Oded Arbel wrote:
> >>  Me like :-)
> >>
> >>  what this about coding ? I thought this is how it works now ? to send
> >>  unicode, I send coding=3.
> >
> >I meant coding=0 7bits, coding=1 8bits coding=2 ucs2 to match the dcs
> >specs
> 
> I would prefer
> 
> coding=0 or missing means autodetect
> coding=1  7 bit
> coding=2  8 bit
> coding=3  UCS2
> 
> that makes the interfaces consistent with olther releases.
> otherwhise lots of people have to change their applications and in 
> kannel-kannel interworking you end up with a version incompatibility.

Because unfortunatly the patches I've done doesn't make any sense now.

"If you want a message class 0, set &mclass=1" :((((

And we need to be able to set '0' values on cgi fields, like pid=0.

The interface have to be broken someday to fix this, and I was only
asking when should it be. between 1.1.6 and 1.2 ? or from 1.3 to 
2.0 ?

Or should I have new fields and deprecate these ones ? (like flash)


> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andreas Fink
> Fink-Consulting
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729  Mobile: +41-79-2457333
> Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
> E-Mail:  [email protected]  Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/  Nickname afink
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.