RE: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long messages.

"Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Like Oded, our applications don't send SM to multiple receivers, but adding
that information seems the right thing to do.

My vote is +1


Angel Fradejas
Mediafusión España, S.A.
[email protected]
www.mediafusion.es
Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
Fax +34 91 572 27 08



-----Mensaje original-----
De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]En
nombre de Stipe Tolj
Enviado el: jueves 18 de abril de 2002 13:41
Para: Oded Arbel
CC: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Asunto: Re: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long
messages.


Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> I didn't like the fact that you removed the reporting from the 'error'
> section in smsbox_req_handle - correct me if I'm wrong, but this way, if
> a split message is sent to multiple receivers, and some of them fail,
> the calling application can't tell how many messages were sent to the
> receivers that didn't fail. or at least, that is my understanding of the
> code.

you're right. Any votes for adding the SMS split information even if
some of the multi-requests fail?

I'm +0 for this.

Stipe

[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.