Re: Windows Kannel?
Andreas Fink <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p05111708b90832e438e1@[193.53.0.55]> |
>On Wed, 15 May 2002, Stipe Tolj wrote: > >> Kalle Marjola wrote: >> > >> > Yeah, I guess cygwin would be sufficient but some people keep asking, can >> > it be done without cygwin there - and I guess cygwin isn't the most >> > efficient one if we want to have high throughput >> >> Cygwin is of course not as fast as a native port would be, but >> comparing the burdons in porting this may be a good trade-off IMO. > >Naturally, but those people keep asking me so I'd love to have some >estimation/etc. to base that opinion on :] (like: a rought guess is that > 3 man-months would be needed to do the porting, do you still think it is > worth it?) (I personally know nothing about windows programming) I dont think its worth it. If someone is serious about performance then he would buy the hardware matching the software. In other words Unix. For testing & Development Cygwin is by far good enough. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink