RE: Patch submission and release policy (Was: [PATCH] problems with HTTPS and base support for per message billing)

If we are to continue to use CVS as a bug fixing and feature adding 
mechanism then we have to do this branching.

Not doing so is going to mean that none of the 'live need to fix it now' 
problems get fixed (or submitted back) as nobody can properly diff against 
the bits they've fixed.

Alex

On Wed, 29 May 2002, Angel Fradejas wrote:

> >If we start doing
> >architectural changes on the CVS, while everyone is using it to build
> >their production, we will break things for people who don't/can't know
> >how to handle it.
> 
> >So a branch is a must before doing any major surgery on the code.
> 
> Totally agree.
> 
> [ Even if I am a "CVS bad guy(tm)" ]
> 
> 
> Angel Fradejas
> Mediafusión España, S.A.
> [email protected]
> www.mediafusion.es
> Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
> Fax +34 91 572 27 08
> 
> 

-- 
Alex Judd
http://www.skywire.co.uk