RE: Patch submission and release policy (Was: [PATCH] problems with HTTPS and base support for per message billing)

--On Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:58 AM -0600 Alex Judd <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> If we are to continue to use CVS as a bug fixing and feature adding
> mechanism then we have to do this branching.
>
> Not doing so is going to mean that none of the 'live need to fix it now'
> problems get fixed (or submitted back) as nobody can properly diff
> against  the bits they've fixed.

I agree fully, that is why I said keep a main branch for development
(unless very experimental) and make stable branches for the releases.
After a release the branch should not need to have that many fixes.
Unless we have not done our testing properly before testing.


Harrie

Internet Management Consulting
mailto: [email protected]                   http://www.lisanza.net/