Re: version 1.1.6 processing limits
Harrie Hazewinkel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8530541.1022844999@localhost> |
--On Friday, May 31, 2002 9:57 AM +0200 Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote: > Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: >> >> --On Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:14 AM +0300 Oded Arbel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > I'm not sure how "native" malloc works, but the checking malloc (which >> > we use always) has an upper limit on the number of allocations >> > allowed. if you want to use more memory you will have to recompile. >> > >> >> Just a thought, but is the amount of system-call casuing some problems. >> Not knowing how much there are, but malloc is one of them. > > yep, that may be. Aarno, what do you mean of this? Did you recognize > anything at your benchmark testings? I understood the others were thinking of some malloc function. Those are system calls and probably locked for exclusive use in a process. Meaning the many multiple threads have to wait on each other. This is just theory, nothing I tested or so. Therefore, I used 'just a thought'. Harrie Internet Management Consulting mailto:[email protected] http ://www.mod-snmp.com/