RE: [patch] smsbox memory leaks and service header
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Let me see if I get this correctly : you want to be able to set, in the HTTP response for a GET or POST query generated by sms-service, the service name for the MT generated from that response. right ? What is it good for ? the only reason I can think of doing it is to have the kannel logs log the dynamic service routing you are doing in the application. why would you want to do that ? -- Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [email protected] (972)-67-340014 (972)-9-9581711 (ext: 116) ::.. I asked my baby if there'd be some way She said she'd save her love for a rainy day I looked in the sky but I look in vain Heavy cloud but no rain. - Sting (Gordon Summer) (Heavy Cloud No Rain/Ten Summoner's Tales) > -----Original Message----- > From: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 6:52 PM > To: Bruno Rodrigues > Cc: Kannel Developers > Subject: RE: [patch] smsbox memory leaks and service header > > > >> 2) allow to change msg->sms.service via X-Kannel-Service > header or xml > tag > >Why should you change the sms.service ? > > > >sms.service is the name field in configuration, for sms-service and > >sendsms-user, so you can identify the service or username used, in > >bearerbox_access.log. > > > >We shouldn't give access to clients connecting through http. > >I vote -1 for this part > > It was intended to identify sms-service, not for smssend > requests, as I do > my service routing outside kannel: every MO goes to default > sms-service, > then the application routes to appropiate service. I wanted > to pass the > service handling the MO back to kannel. > > I could rework the patch to allow this X-Kannel header only > on MO handling. > Does this sound better to you? > > > Angel Fradejas > Mediafusión España, S.A. > [email protected] > www.mediafusion.es > Tel. +34 91 252 32 00 > Fax +34 91 572 27 08 > > > > > >