Re: Kannel's module API

Harrie Hazewinkel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <24247902.1023811126@localhost>
(resend, since it bounced due to wrong sender address)

Hi Stipe,

--On Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:24 AM +0200 Stipe Tolj 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Harrie,
>
> I liked the document you wrote about Kannel's API structure. Hope that
> more of the other developers have a chance to review it. I'll have a
> deaper look into the patch itself.

The patch itself needs some updating, since some other changes
cause collisions. I will update it in a day or 2.

>
> IMO, the way apache-1.3 does the modularization may be addopted to
> Kannel for those API purposes. What do the the others think of this?

It is indeed based on that :-)) We even could do it based on the
Apache 2.0 api, but that is somehow trivial. The concept for now
is more important.

>
> Should we start re-constructing the current devel tree after we
> released 1.2.0 and keep a stable branch?
>
> I'm +1 for re-constructing

Not sure, what you mean here. But I assume you want
to branch for the 1.2.0 releases and development goes
into head, right??

>
> a) to a general autoconf layout, hence utilize libtool (yet no
> assigned volonteers here)

Using libtool is not directly my goal, but it seems to make
things as porting easier. I also believe that making the build
process a bit more fixed is not a bad thing. Now it creates some
libraries of arbitrary files and things can easily extended
where a new 'gmake .depend' seem to add

> b) for modularization using a Kannel API structure (Harrie will be
> leading this effort, because he's highly involved in Apache's API
> structure and has most experiences here IMO)

I don't have Kannel as some kind of day-job, unlike some of the others
here. Meaning as soon I have some paid-work that will get more priority.
But I am willing to lead this effort. I even would not mind working on
this for some company who needs it. :-))

>
> BTW, I'm working on a new Kannel web site (using PHP4 and MySQL) and
> other funny things ;)

Cool. What about ssh on the cvs server?? That would make things
more secure on that part too.




Harrie

Internet Management Consulting
mailto:[email protected]                http ://www.mod-snmp.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.