Re: AT1
"Alex Judd" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yep - IMO AT2 is now stable enough (in fact significantly more stable than AT1) to drop AT1. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Fink" <[email protected]> To: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: AT1 > >On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 11:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Guys, > >> > >> I am looking at the code here in smsc_at.c > > > >Could we drop AT module on release 1.2 ? > > > >Is it there something still lacking in AT2 ? > > > +1 from me. > Same question applies to EMI version 1. > > -- > > Andreas Fink > Fink-Consulting > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 > Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland > E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink