RE: SMPP Time definitions - deferred/validity

I'd say thats definetly a bug - think of what would happen if someone in a negative time zone to GMT difference would use SMPP.

--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[email protected]

+972-9-9581711
+972-67-340014

::..
"Brilliance is typically the act of an individual, but incredible stupidity can 
usually be traced to an organization." 
	-- Jon Bentley 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:31 PM
> To: Oded Arbel
> Cc: Alan McNatty; Kannel Dev
> Subject: Re: SMPP Time definitions - deferred/validity
> 
> 
> Oded Arbel wrote:
> > 
> > Right you are - haven't thought about that one :-)
> > 
> > +1 from me, as it is now (i.e : haven't thought of a cute 
> format hack to address the gwqdiff negative issue).
> 
> should this be considered a bug or a feature?
> In other words, should it go in before tagging 1.2.0 or into the later
> development branch?
> 
> At least it's in STATUS file now.
> 
> Stipe
> 
> [email protected]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
> 
> Vogelsanger Weg 80
> 40470 Düsseldorf
> 
> Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> 
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> wapme.net - wherever you are
>