RE: [FYI] critical bug in EMI2 module

--On Monday, August 5, 2002 10:42 AM +0100 Bruno David Rodrigues 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Haven't someone branch the code on 1.2.0 ?
> If so (I hope so :P), the fixes (not the new features) should have
> been commited on HEAD AND on 1.2.0 branch, and now we'll just have
> to tag a 1.2.1 and release it.

There is a branch stable_1_2_0.
But nothing went in there since tag version_1_2_0.


>
> we should have tagged 1.2.0 with 1.3.0 too, so now we could release
> 1.3.1 with the new features (if any).

I am confused here, you already want to make tags for 1.3.0??
That makes no sense to me, or I am missing something.

>
> Don't just release HEAD as 1.2.1... if 1.2 is stable, it should only
> include fixes.
>
>
Thus the branch is not used??. If we prefer this approach, we better
create the branch if needed, instead of at the point of a stable release.


my 2 euorcents,

Harrie

Internet Management Consulting
mailto:[email protected]                http ://www.mod-snmp.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Author of MOD-SNMP, enabling SNMP management to the Apache server.