Re: Versioning (was: critical bug in EMI2 module)
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wapme Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> In that case, and if you can easily distinguish between the fix patches and the new features patches, then do patch the 1_2_0 branch and release as 1.2.1. yep. > As for 1.3 - IMO we shouldn't tag the head - when we feel that it's stable enough, then we can release it as 1.3.0 (stable). I don't think we should be folowing the "linux kernel style" versioning system, since there is no real need for versioning the development branch - every one just uses the CVS HEAD. +1 > Speaking of EMI2 and new features, would someone please look at the EMI2 patches Dima subnmitted last week and comit to CVS or at least comment about ? > > Here it is attached (again). I'll have the chance to do this today. Oded, are you voting for the patch, which means you tested it and are +1 for commiting it? Stipe [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are