RE: write failed with errno 11

I can't see how this last problem is even related to AT2 : it didn't occour in the module but in the part of bearerbox that connects to the wapbox. as far as I can the wapbox connected to bearerbox, then tried to send some wap packet on which bearerbox choked before even getting to the AT2 module itself. 
OTOH - I'm hardly a WAP expert, and since SMS isn't involved in here at all as far as I understand - maybe someone on the devel list can offer an idea ?

--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[email protected]

+972-9-9581711 (116)
+972-67-340014

::..
Ego is a powerful drug.
	-- Matthew Wallace

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephane Pointu [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:48 PM
> To: Oded Arbel
> Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11
> 
> 
> Here is a part of the log file of one complete running process. If you
> really need the complete log file (more than 1Mb) of course i 
> can send it to
> you.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephane.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 08 August 2002 15:37
> To: Stephane Pointu; Stipe Tolj
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11
> 
> 
> 
> Actually - it still doesn't tell me anything :-) I would like 
> to see more
> logging of thread 14. is it possible for you to email me the 
> log file itself
> - privately, of course ?
> 
> --
> Oded Arbel
> m-Wise mobile solutions
> [email protected]
> 
> +972-9-9581711 (116)
> +972-67-340014
> 
> ::..
> Commitment, n.:
>      Commitment can be illustrated by a breakfast of ham and eggs.
>      The chicken was involved, the pig was committed.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephane Pointu [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:33 PM
> > To: Oded Arbel; Stipe Tolj
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11
> > 
> > 
> > It's from the second patch. And here is the log:
> > 
> > 2002-08-08 15:24:56 [5] INFO: AT2[T68]: AT SMSC successfully opened.
> > 2002-08-08 15:24:58 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: --> AT+CBC;+CSQ^M
> > 2002-08-08 15:24:59 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- +CBC: 0,37
> > 2002-08-08 15:24:59 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- +CSQ: 8,99
> > 2002-08-08 15:24:59 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- OK
> > 2002-08-08 15:24:59 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: --> AT+CPMS?^M
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:00 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- +CPMS:
> > "SM",0,12,"SM",0,12,"ME",0,70
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:00 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- OK
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:05 [12] DEBUG: Started thread 16 
> > (gw/bb_boxc.c:function)
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:05 [16] INFO: Client connected from <127.0.0.1>
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:05 [16] DEBUG: setting up systems for new wapbox
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:05 [16] DEBUG: Started thread 17 
> > (gw/bb_boxc.c:boxc_sender)
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:32 [14] ERROR: Packet too short while 
> unpacking Msg.
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:32 [14] ERROR: Msg packet was invalid.
> > 2002-08-08 15:25:32 [14] ERROR: Failed to unpack data!
> > 
> > I get this on sending a normal SMS. On sending a second one 
> > nothing more
> > appears in the log. It seems to be stuck.
> > 
> > Stephane.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 08 August 2002 15:24
> > To: Stephane Pointu; Stipe Tolj
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11
> > 
> > 
> > The first patch or the second ?
> > can I have a few more lines of log (above and below what you 
> > submitted),
> > please?
> > 
> > --
> > Oded Arbel
> > m-Wise mobile solutions
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > +972-9-9581711 (116)
> > +972-67-340014
> > 
> > ::..
> > Love is not just looking at each other, it's looking in the 
> > same direction.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stephane Pointu [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:21 PM
> > > To: 'Stipe Tolj'; Oded Arbel
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I now get another error message:
> > > 
> > > 2002-08-08 15:13:57 [14] ERROR: Packet too short while 
> > unpacking Msg.
> > > 2002-08-08 15:13:57 [14] ERROR: Msg packet was invalid.
> > > 2002-08-08 15:13:57 [14] ERROR: Failed to unpack data!
> > > 
> > > I used the latest snapshot patched with what you sent.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stephane.
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: 08 August 2002 15:12
> > > To: Oded Arbel
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: write failed with errno 11
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Here's an updated patch. this one should actually compile. 
> > > it also has a
> > > rewritten handling of the SMS-SUBMIT flags, which includes 
> > > support for the
> > > new rpi parameter (have no idea what it does) and for future 
> > > handling of DLR
> > > messages.
> > > 
> > > the reply path indicator (RPI) flas causes answers that 
> are given on
> > > an incoming SMS to be routed to the save SMSC number as 
> the SMS that
> > > arrives.
> > > 
> > > Hence you "temporarely" overwritte the handsets SMSC number 
> > entry for
> > > replying to this specific messages.
> > > 
> > > Stipe
> > > 
> > > [email protected]
> > > 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Wapme Systems AG
> > > 
> > > Vogelsanger Weg 80
> > > 40470 Düsseldorf
> > > 
> > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> > > Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> > > 
> > > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> > > 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > wapme.net - wherever you are
> > > 
> > 
> 
>