RE: write failed with errno 11
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes - CMS error 500 is an unknown error, but I think I know why it happened and it's my fault. I'm not sure yet why it did what it did, but I'm going to fix it. -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [email protected] +972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014 ::.. "So mutable is really the prophecised anti-Const, yes?" -- Doug Schmidt > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephane Pointu [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 4:32 PM > To: 'Paul Keogh'; Kannel-devel (E-mail) > Cc: Oded Arbel > Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11 > > > I did a make distclean and recompiled... Now i have another > error message: > > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: international > starting with 00 > (0033666666666) > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: TP-Validity-Period: > 24.0 hours > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: --> AT+CMGS=21^M > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- > > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: send command status: 1 > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: --> > 0000000B913366567902F60000A707D4F29CEE72B900 > 2002-08-08 16:22:29 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: --> ^Z > 2002-08-08 16:22:30 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- > > 2002-08-08 16:22:30 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: <-- +CMS ERROR: 500 > 2002-08-08 16:22:30 [5] ERROR: AT2[T68]: CMS ERROR: +CMS ERROR: 500 > 2002-08-08 16:22:30 [5] DEBUG: AT2[T68]: send command status: 1 > > CMS ERROR 500 is an unknown error! Is it really unknown? > > Stephane. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Keogh [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 08 August 2002 16:06 > To: Kannel-devel (E-mail) > Subject: RE: write failed with errno 11 > > > > > > 2002-08-08 15:25:32 [14] ERROR: Packet too short while > > > unpacking Msg. > > > > 2002-08-08 15:25:32 [14] ERROR: Msg packet was invalid. > > > > 2002-08-08 15:25:32 [14] ERROR: Failed to unpack data! > > > > > > This is symptomatic of a change to the Msg struct without all the > affected modules being recompiled. I would guess that either the > wap or sms box is out of sync with the bearer box in this respect. >