RE: MMS Task Force

HI Alex,

--On Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:02 PM +0100 Alex Judd 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Agreed. The main priority should be to be complete the functionality
> needed to be able to send and recieve messages to and from a variety of
> different 1st phase released MMS-Cs as per the current live v1 WAP MMS
> protocol implementation.

Since there were also some question like 'I don't know it all??'
maybe it is wise to create a web page that provides links to specific
(useful) documents.

>
> From this point of view adding complete support for SAR is one of the
> current blocks and we have a good start in this area with the recent
> submissions. Testing is obviously needed here and access to the amount of
> software/hardware you have would be great.
>
> Potentially I would also suggest a seperate cvs branch which can be
> developed on without breaking the rest of the functionality. As most of us
> here use the cvs version of Kannel as staging (or often as live), I'd like
> to make sure that the changes don't stop the bug fixes.

I agree here. It was the way forward I see too.
The branch also allows the group to experiment more.

>
> Stipe - any thoughts?

Some time ago he mentioned he would be on vacation.
That could be now, since he mostly reacts quickly.

Harrie

Internet Management Consulting
mailto:[email protected]                http ://www.mod-snmp.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Author of MOD-SNMP, enabling SNMP management to the Apache server.