RE: SMSC-box?
"Oded Arbel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
can't see how that would help, as bearerbox does little more then handle the SMSC drivers. What you probably need is a way to multiplex bearerboxes, each with a different driver. you can do it, as long as you use different smsboxes too. I've yet to see a setup that requires so much resources that it can benefit from being put on more then one machine - and I've seen some high load ones. -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [email protected] +972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014 ::.. Nick : "Playing strip poker with an exhibitionist somehow takes the challenge out of it. -- from "Metropolitan" > -----Original Message----- > From: Rene Kluwen / Chimit Software Solutions > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: SMSC-box? > > > Hello devel, > > When reading the docs, I came upon a question. > Have there been thoughts about putting the smsc-interfaces into a > seperate box? > And then have the messages come in through a connector, the same way > as UDP datagrams come in? > True... I think in daily usage, most people use only 1 smsc. > But if requirements are lots of messages per minute. This feature > would add to scalability in terms of just putting more hardware. > > Just my 2 cts. > > -- > Best regards, > Rene mailto:[email protected] > > >