RE: [REPOST] [PATCH] emi2 reconnection behaviour

"Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Oded, that's exactly what I did in my patch and wanted to do.... I even
removed the "retry" option, as the rest of drivers....but it seems not
everybody agrees with that :-(

I think the "retry" directive is a bad idea, whatever it defaults to.

If you don't want a reconnection, you just can set the "reconnect-delay" to
a very high value, and you're done (as in the rest of drivers).

So I guess we need consensus here.

Angel.

  -----Mensaje original-----
  De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]En
nombre de Oded Arbel
  Enviado el: lunes 23 de septiembre de 2002 16:34
  Para: Angel Fradejas
  CC: [email protected]
  Asunto: RE: [REPOST] [PATCH] emi2 reconnection behaviour


  I'd suggest to set the default of retry as 'yes', as most users do use EMI
over TCP/IP.

  --
  Oded Arbel
  m-Wise mobile solutions
  [email protected]

  +972-9-9581711 (116)
  +972-67-340014

  ::..
  "Existence is not only temporary, it's pointless!"
   -- Calvin and Hobbes




    -----Original Message-----
    From: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:13 PM
    To: Andreas Fink
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: [REPOST] [PATCH] emi2 reconnection behaviour


    Ok, sounds reasonable for me. I didn't know that fact for Germany.

    So I can resubmit the patch, keeping the "retry" directive, with "no" as
default (as it is actually), and fix the behaviour with a "reconnect-delay"
directive, with a 10 seconds default.

    Is this ok?

    Angel.

      -----Mensaje original-----
      De: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]En nombre de Andreas Fink
      Enviado el: lunes 23 de septiembre de 2002 13:44
      Para: Angel Fradejas
      CC: [email protected]
      Asunto: Re: [REPOST] [PATCH] emi2 reconnection behaviour



      On Montag, September 23, 2002, at 10:33 Uhr, Angel Fradejas wrote:


        >Somehow I disageee. Some folks use EMI/UCP on dialup links so you
don't
        > want to have it retry all the time and open the link.
        >"It always assumes reconnection" is thus not a good idea.

        Then we could mark it as a compatibility-breaker in the next
release. I think there are much more people using it over direct tcp links
than dialup ones.



      This is definitively wrong for users in Germany as the german carriers
don't allow connectivity over the internet usually but only over 2Mbps
permanent leased line (very expensive) or ISDN dial-on demand dialup to a
private network.

      I think we simply should fix the existing behaviour instead of
inventing another new one.



      Andreas Fink
      Global Networks, Inc.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333
      Global Networks, Inc. Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
      Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/  [email protected]
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      Member of the GSM Association
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.