RE: T68i as SMSC

"Schaich, Peter" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Oded,

I would say 'No', because it will make the
at2_pdu_decode_deliver_sm more robust.
Ok, it is not needed, because this crash only
happened because i hacked the switch statement
in at2_pdu_decode, but nevertheless...

Regards,

Peter


 


-----Original Message-----
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Mittwoch, 6. November 2002 14:46
To: Schaich, Peter; Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Subject: RE: T68i as SMSC




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schaich, Peter [mailto:[email protected]]

> I now found the problem, it was a (simple) misconfiguration 
> of the SMSC: I added "no-smsc = true" (I've misinterpreted
> the user manual), but actually there was the smsc phone
> number in the PDU, so the at2_pdu_extract skipped
> the removal of the smsc phone number and the decode_deliver_sm()
> failed when looking at the TP-OA address.

Yes - both you and Markku Luosto are correct, I misinterpeted the PDU.
Should I revert thce changes I've made to the AT2 module ? the change was to
add

if (len > 20)
	goto msg_error;

and

if (pos > octstr_len(pdu)
	goto msg_error;

in couple of important places.

--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions
[email protected]

+972-9-9581711 (116)
+972-67-340014

::..
there are no big words, only little people
Schaich, Peter.vcf (application/octet-stream, 157 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.