RE: SAR
Igor Ivoilov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> And Igore, our implementation of SAR is done in wtp > layer(In the wtp > state machine. ). Is there any advantage to implement SAR in > a layer below > wtp ?? > SAR is part of WTP and imho must be implemented on this level. My implementation is done like that. Your implementation introduces 2 new states of WTP machine that are not defined in WAP-224-WTP. I thought about it when wrote the patch and decided that this way gives more complicate algorithm. Anyway I will appreciate very much if you point out conditions where nack is proceed not properly in my implementation. Tcpdump of a failed session can help me the best. Igor