Re: delivery reports and EMI [known bug issue]

On Mittwoch, November 13, 2002, at 08:25  Uhr, Nisan Bloch wrote:

> Hi
>
> snips from all the postings
> At 07:59 AM 11/13/02 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
>
>>> We have a work around, which is a bit hacky but works for us. We use 
>>> the 8 right most digits of the number to match the DLR in the 
>>> db/store.
>>
>> That would not be good enough in most cases.
>
>
> why? given that there is a timestamp and destination  in the dlr 
> tables. one would need multiple messages in quick succession, within 1 
> second to the same nmber, to end up with a clash. This is not ideal 
> but works in most cases.
>

Ok. lets at least add the last 8 digits of the phone number to the 
timestamp to make it unique.
I think thats a good compromize which solves 99.9% of the problems. 
Stipe, got your patch ready or shall I upgrade cvs?