Re: delivery reports and EMI [known bug issue]

At 08:38 PM 11/13/02 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:

>On Mittwoch, November 13, 2002, at 08:25  Uhr, Nisan Bloch wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>
>>snips from all the postings
>>At 07:59 AM 11/13/02 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
>>
>>>>We have a work around, which is a bit hacky but works for us. We use 
>>>>the 8 right most digits of the number to match the DLR in the db/store.
>>>
>>>That would not be good enough in most cases.
>>
>>
>>why? given that there is a timestamp and destination  in the dlr tables. 
>>one would need multiple messages in quick succession, within 1 second to 
>>the same nmber, to end up with a clash. This is not ideal but works in 
>>most cases.
>
>Ok. lets at least add the last 8 digits of the phone number to the 
>timestamp to make it unique.
>I think thats a good compromize which solves 99.9% of the problems. Stipe, 
>got your patch ready or shall I upgrade cvs?


the way we did it is not to add the 8 digits to the timestamp, but to have 
an alternative to the dlr_find_mysql function that uses the 8 digits from 
the dest in the SQL select. I am not using the latest CVS, so still have 
the older dlr functionality, but I can send u the relevant cuts from the code.

nisan