Re: [BUG] smsc stop start

Hi
At 03:57 PM 11/20/02 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > If we store the smsc as submitted in the original request from smsbox, 
> it would be stored as link1 but the incoming sms would still be link1a..c
> > so the only way would be to have another name in the DLR code for 
> grouping SMSC links together for DLR's. Another parameter? I would like 
> to avoid this.
>
>yep, me too.

ditto.. I gave this some thought, and dont like the idea of yet another 
parameter, but it may be needed. We thought of a symbolic name for each 
link that is only used for the stop/start and maybe in the status page. 
This way the smsc-id routing can stay as is.

>Hmmm, let's think about if we can solve this on another way...

We could however put an extra element into the smscconn structure to 
uniquely id a particular link, and then get bearerbox to generate a HTML 
page that can be used to stop and start SMSC links.

The disadvantage of this is that one will have to use the "admin page" to 
stop and start links, rather than been able to automate or script it. We 
may still have the problem of identifying the equivalent links on this 
page.  We like Andreas have parallel links to the same provider, with dlrs 
comming in on any of the links and not necessary the one the message was 
sent out on.

Nisan