Re: [BUG] smsc stop start

Nisan Bloch schrieb:
> 
> At 08:02 PM 11/20/02 +0100, Andreas Fink wrote:
> 
> >how about simply numbering the SMSC's?
> >
> >or do something like
> >
> >smsc=link1 start/stops all "link1" links
> >
> >smsc=5  start/stops the 5th link
> >
> >smsc=link1:1    start/stops the 1st link of the group "link1"
> >
> 
> I like this..  We could alter the status page to display a "link number".
> Small change though
> smsc=link1  start/stops all "link1" links
> smsc=link1:1 start/stops the 1st link of the group "link1"
> smsc-no=5 start/stops the 5th link
> 
> Otherwise smsc-ids that are a numeric (silly, but it may happen), will
> cause problems.

yep, I don't thing numbering would be good in this case.

To be honest I'd rather tend to avoid this hacky packy numbering and
agree to the previous thought that a stop/start operation should apply
to all smsc links that carry that specific smsc-id.

Would this solve all your issues?! 

I mean this is fairly ok, because it does not break the behaviour if
you have a group of links that are not named the same and logically
some may start/stop them with their unique smsc-id. So at least
nothing would break in our systems :)

> We should think about getting the stop /start to reload the config file for
> that link. This way we can change the configuration and simply stop/start
> that link, rahter than bouncing Kannel.

?? explain that please.


Stipe

[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are