Re: Notice of issue in SMPP Driver

Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization Wapme Systems AG
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alexander Malysh wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi Stipe, all,
> 
> On Monday 13 January 2003 22:54, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > should we introduce transmitter and receiver dependent status flags,
> > like
> >
> >  smpp->conn->status->receiver = SMSCCON_RECONNECTING;
> >  smpp->conn->status->transmitter = SMSCCON_ACTIVE.
> >
> > ??
> 
> it looks ugly (IMHO). What about , just to allow either receiver or
> transmitter or transceiver ? Like so:
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> port = xxx
> host = xxx
> 
> group = smsc
> smsc = smpp
> receive-port = xxx
> receive-host = xxx
> 
> ??

wuuuooo. that means you can't use the same smsc-id for sending and
receiving. :(

Stipe

[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.