Re: [RFC] smppbox cvs module

At 02:17 PM 1/26/03 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>Hi list,
>
>if Wapme releases it's SMPP server implementation (smppbox) to kannel,
>would we include it directly to kannel's gateway cvs module, or would
>we inheritate an own module called smppbox?
>
>The benefit of having an own module would imply that other SMSC server
>implementation, i.e. EMI/UCP maybe called emibox and hence a cleaner
>code seperation would be present.

Yes, rather keep it as a separate module.



>I think smsbox should be a base interface to bearerbox (using common
>HTTP for the low level user and aggregator) and smppbox, emibox and
>whatever would be more for the professional SMS carriers and hosters.


What of potential merges with Kalle's Netikos (some of which is much better 
than Kannel) and the path they have taking of combining bearerbox and smsbox?

Nisan