Re: [PATCH] cimd2 validity period

On Sáb, 2003-02-01 at 12:21, Nicholas Rahn wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 04:47, Bruno David
> S=?ISO-8859-1?B?aW31ZXMgUm9kcmlndWVz?= wrote:
> > Citando Nicholas Rahn <[email protected]>:
> > 
> > > Hi list,
> > > 
> > > Attached is a patch implementing the validity period (relative) for
> > > CIMD2 connections.  It has been tested with one of our swiss CIMD2
> > > connections.
> > > 
> > > The documentation for the "validity" parameter (sendsms interface) in
> > > the User's Guide does not mention that this functionality might not be
> > > implemented for certain SMSC types.  
> > 
> > A quick search for validity shows:
> > Can set Validity
> >   ? ? ? ? y ? ? ? ? y ? ?
> > 
> > We can't mention for each parameter that "this might work or might not work for
> > depending on connected smsc".
> > 
> > Better solution is to ask smsc developers to implement it and fix documentation ;)
> 
> Best solution is for me to actually read that section of the
> documentation before complaining.  ;-)

No, it's good if someone complains. That way someone would remember that
he can do that patch and update documentation :)))))

> nick

-- 
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+O+2UbMTNtJey1hkRAhY8AKClvNBYlxErZhI2WJWYaNEyllqoFQCgqoiU
dr5lVmGt8TR/v0d2Xoa5J3s=
=lBva
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----