Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]
Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: >Citando Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]>: > > > >>Hi, >> >>Actually... What is really the reason for not having really descriptive >>status text? >>There is already a list of definitions for status-codes... >>So i believe it would not be a problem to make same for status-text... >>or is it? >> >>Having OK as status-text is really confusing... but so also having >>Foo/Bar in some cases... >> >>So... [ if i may really vote on anything ;) ] >>i would vote +2 on making status-text be real rfc compliant (and thus >>descriptive) >>or +1 for having at least Foo/Bar instead of OK >> >> > >Are you offering to build that table in .c for kannel ? ;)))))))) > > Yes... that is just an array of strings, nothing more ;) [ and i would put it in .h - where the definitions for http-status are ;) ] Note: i am not offerring to make kannel parse these values from RFC although it is also a possability ;-)) Regards, Konstantin Vayner Appcell MT