Re: Where's my FOO ? [Was: Daily patch: gateway]

Citando Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]>:

> Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> 
> >Citando Konstantin Vayner <[email protected]>:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>i would vote +2 on making status-text be real rfc compliant (and thus 
> >>descriptive)
> >>or +1 for having at least Foo/Bar instead of OK
> >
> >Are you offering to build that table in .c for kannel ? ;))))))))
> >
> Yes... that is just an array of strings, nothing more ;)
> [ and i would put it in .h - where the definitions for http-status are ;) ]

Nice :)))) 

Can I still have my octstr_send_random_foo_sometimes() ? :)))
or a if(user-agent =~ /ms.xmlhttp/) do array[202] = "I therefor accept your 
message but I don't fscking know if I'd want to sent it" ?
(kidding)


> Note: i am not offerring to make kannel parse these values from RFC 
> although it is also a possability ;-))

No need for that. Status is the one that matters, status text doesn't matter 
at all.


> Regards,
>    Konstantin Vayner
>    Appcell MT
> 
> 
> 


-- 
<br/>