Re: T68i incorrect support of CNMI
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Citando Alex Judd <[email protected]>: > Yes - it does look like it's well and truly broken. > > However... it does work fine if it's configured with sim-buffering so > perhaps we change the default settings for the T68i to be that. At least > that way it works? Yes please, just edit modems.conf and send us the patch. If you want, you can even add comment lines "# 3,1,2,3 this should work because manual says so but this stupid mobile simply rejects us". ;) fortunatly, it's a great "small mobile" to carry inside your pocket and feed your pda with gprs and bluetooth - If i have 3 timeslots available, t68 will deliver me the full 43.2kbps :)))))) but for calling or messaging, forget > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruno Rodrigues" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:42 PM > Subject: Re: T68i incorrect support of CNMI > > > > Citando Alex Judd <[email protected]>: > > > > > RE: [Fwd: Removing WTP-SAR limit 32768 B]Anyone else noticed that the > T68i > > > appears to break the rules of the CNMI command in smsc_at2.c? > > > > > > AT+CNMI=? > > > +CNMI: (3),(0,1,3),(0,2),(0),(0) > > > > Haven't I commented modems.conf with something like "# Ericsson T68 - > forget it" ? -- Davi / Bruno.Rodrigues<at>Litux.Org Litux.org: 09:55:17 up 87 days, 11:10, 7 users, load average: 0.06, 0.03, 0.00 '"World domination. Fast" (By Linus Torvalds)'