Re: multiple bearer box ?

Alexander Malysh wrote:
> 
> Not 100% true ;) We run one logical link per bearerbox (e.g. 3 sessions for
> one offerer). For now I have not seen any performance bottleneck issues with
> bearerbox. Some of our bearerboxes running with ~60sms/sec. Now you will ask,
> why multiple bearerboxes ;) It's easy... It's more simple to maintain/route
> messages beetwen multiple bearerboxes. For example bearerbox do not support
> dynamic config reload and it's just more simple to read/write ~30 Lines of
> config file as 300 lines ;)

that's true. That's why we implemented the 'include = <file>' feature
for the config file handling, so you can structurize the global config
file for your own needs.

It's like you setup an apache config for every VHost you'd like to
run.

The best argument for the "one bearerbox per logical link ;)" is
indeed the lacking of hot-restart functionability.

AFAIK, the Netikos version had such things. We should definetly start
to port things from their version to the official tree.

Stipe

[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are