Re: [PATCH] adds ack/nack bbox<->smsbox

Hmm,

Won't this patch helps greatly in tracking status requests?

We could use this instead of playing around with dlr-url.

Furthermore, suppose we have a listener that forwards messages to bearerbox,

the bearerbox now can notify the listener back with this ack/nack message. Is this correct?

Rgds

Rachman

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:55:24 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:

>looks good. I'm just wondering how we may react on a receive in the

>smsbox of the ack messages. Currently they are not handled there at

>all.