RE: [PATCH] CIMD2 driver upgraded to smsconn api

"Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yep that's the same error the SMSC gives when, for example, I set parameter
064 Tariff class on some of my connections. It only says that the SMSC
doesn't allow you to do it.

I don't think there is a method to know if your smsc supports/allows
delivery reports. You'll have to ask your provider.

Even in the case that the SMSC accepts a message with
P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST set, it does not guarantee you that SMSC will in
fact pass your application the delivery report.

Angel Fradejas
Mediafusión España, S.A.
[email protected]
www.mediafusion.es
Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
Fax +34 91 572 27 08


-----Mensaje original-----
De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]En nombre de
Dziugas Baltrunas
Enviado el: martes 25 de marzo de 2003 16:53
Para: Kannel Developers
Asunto: RE: [PATCH] CIMD2 driver upgraded to smsconn api


here is additional information what CIMD2 reports:

2003-03-25 17:50:47 [12] ERROR: CIMD2[mysmsc]: Submit message response
contained error message:
2003-03-25 17:50:47 [12] ERROR: code 310: Incorrect status report request
parameter usage

regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:

> I would like to ask Angel, as CIMD2 guru, is there any way to check out
> if CIMD2 SMSC supports status delivery report requests?
>
> currently the logic is simple:
>
> if (msg->sms.dlr_mask & 0x03)
> {
> 	packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 14);
> }
> else
> 	packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 0);
>
> the problem is that if CIMD2 doesn't support status report,
> packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 0) would
> still  cause a reject from SMSC not sending message at all. the only
> solution I  found was to send nothing  about P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST (i.e.
> commenting out the line).
>
> unfortunately I don't know if our provider has prohibited it using the
> right issues (i.e. configuration file or something), so stating that my
> operator's CIMD2 "doesn't support DLR" is not true. it's just forbidden :)
>
> regards,
> Dziugas Baltrunas
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> > >I currently was writing a question to the mailing list about plans to
> > >rewrite CIMD2 to smsconn :))
> > >
> > >great job, Angel.
> > >
> > >regards,
> > >Dziugas Baltrunas
> >
> > mmmm not to worry anybody, but I'm currently debugging and optimizing
some
> > issues in the driver.... What I'd really like is to make it work the
same
> > way as SMPP in transceiver mode.
> >
> > Well, first I'll fix it, then think about new internal design.
> >
> > Angel Fradejas
> > Mediafusión Espa?a, S.A.
> > [email protected]
> > www.mediafusion.es
> > Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
> > Fax +34 91 572 27 08
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.