Re: [PATCH] smsc_cimd2.c sleep times

"Dziugas Baltrunas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <009901c2f7b3$98f67310$c8602fd4@dark>
yes, you were right. specifying  -r1.9, then -rHEAD in the end of cvs update command 
solved the problem. i'm curious to know of cvs mechanism itself - is there any time 
which has "to pass" in order to say for 'cvs update' to get the most recent files, i.e. when
HEAD version becomes "most recent" ? (yeeah, it's off-topic, sorry). 

here is the snip from manual:
       -r tag Use the revision specified by the tag argument  instead  of  the
              default  ``head''  revision. 

thanks for the help and sorry for confusing things. i think it's time to end this thread :)

regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
To: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: 2003 m. kovo 31 d. 19:02
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smsc_cimd2.c sleep times


> > so the question is - why mine cvs update didin't fetch version 1.9?
> 
> I guess it has still it's sticky bit on it for the revision you
> updated previously.
> 
> Stipe
> 
> [email protected]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
> 
> Vogelsanger Weg 80
> 40470 Düsseldorf
> 
> Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> 
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> wapme.net - wherever you are
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.