Re: MM7
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wapme Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Keogh wrote: > > > I'd say Kannel would first need to be an actual MMSC > > otherwise I don't see > > the point of MM7. > > No. MM7 is the VASP interface to an MMSC and in this respect > Kannel is a logical place to have MM7. I agree to both, in some sence. MMSC implementation *will* come. Consider this as aimed. And we'll also need then MM7 as MMSC-to-MMSC protocoll for MMS roaming. > > Or you would have to implement just the sending half of MM7 > > using Kannel's > > ppg features. > > Nothing in MM7 requires a PPG, either for sending or receiving. > Its a HTTP/SOAP/XML interface. > > Check out 3GPP TS 23.140 V6.0.0 (2002-12) for the architecture. yep, but beware. The 3GPP documents basically do recommend things. They do not very deaply specify. Our own MMSC (written in Java) has MM7 implementation via HTTP/SOAP/XML. But we face the problem that some operators in Germany run CMG's MMSC, which uses PAP/XML as used in a PPG for the MMS (as multi-parted content) injection. Stipe [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are