Re: smsc messages

"Patrick Mignott" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <005801c2ff91$146cca50$0200a8c0@domainadmin>
i also get this warning message before  each of the errors.. i attached it
incase someone see something that can help me out.

2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NUL terminated string has no NUL.
........the rest of the message............

2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG: SMPP[INFOSERVICE]: Got PDU:
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x80f2f00 dump:
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 = 0x80000004
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG:   command_status: 255 = 0x000000ff
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 22827 = 0x0000592b
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG:   message_id: NULL
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2003-04-10 11:46:16 [8] ERROR: SMPP[INFOSERVICE]: SMSC returned error code
0x0
000ff in response to submit_sm.






----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Fellows-McCully" <[email protected]>
To: "'Patrick Mignott'" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Ciaran Dunne" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: smsc messages


> Patrick,
>
> Yes, we sorted that out a long time ago. Lots of new stuff in there as
> well including a fully featured Push Proxy Gateway and MMS gateway that
> talks all of the MMS protocols, MM7, MM4, Nokia, SMTP etc.
>
> pfm
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrick Mignott [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 10 April 2003 17:18
> > To: Peter Fellows-McCully
> > Subject: Re: smsc messages
> >
> >
> > hi peter... not right now!!!! :-) this new smsc is not
> > working out very well.. how are you Guys?. Did you ever solve
> > the issue with the bearer box not reconnecting with the SMSC
> > after time-out?
> >
> > have any ideas to my issue? is the CMG a good service?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Fellows-McCully" <[email protected]>
> > To: "'Patrick Mignott'" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:01 AM
> > Subject: RE: smsc messages
> >
> >
> > > Hi Patrick,
> > >
> > > Good to see you're still at the SMS stuff. How are things? Are you
> > > making money?
> > >
> > > pfm
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > > > Behalf Of Patrick Mignott
> > > > Sent: 10 April 2003 16:36
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Fw: smsc messages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hello. I am connected to a CMG SMPP 3.3 service for the
> > last 5 week
> > > > everything was ok, however I started to see about 10% FAIL sent
> > > > message. (incoming is ok) now it's about 70% fail. I am not sure
> > > > what the problem is but I suspect it's with CMG...please see the
> > > > error messages below.. my volumes are very low.. what
> > could it be ?
> > > >
> > > >  3 error messages!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >  \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> > >  2003-04-09 17:12:19 [7] ERROR: SMPP[INFOSERVICE]: SMSC
> > returned error
> > > code  0x00000058 in response to submit_sm.
> > > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> > >  2003-04-09 17:19:19 [7] ERROR: SMPP[INFOSERVICE]: SMSC
> > returned error
> > > code  0x00000014 in response to submit_sm.
> > > \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> > >  2003-04-09 17:19:19 [7] ERROR: SMPP[INFOSERVICE]: SMSC
> > returned error
> > > code  0x000000FF in response to submit_sm.
> > > //////////////////////////////////
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.