Re: Re[2]: sendsms HTTP 202 status response

thanks for the answer, Angel.

when I wrote the previous message, I exactly thought about future implementation
of ack/nack handling between smsbox and bearerbox - there 202 response
would be very suitable. 

it's not a problem for me to use fsockopen() or other higher level functions, I just
was interseted, what's the reason of 202 at all. 

thanks again.

regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jury Cherepanov" <[email protected]>
To: "Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: 2003 m. balandžio 20 d. 20:24
Subject: Re[2]: sendsms HTTP 202 status response


> Hello Angel,
> 
> Sunday, April 20, 2003, 12:26:51 PM, you wrote:
> 
> >>everything is OK execpt using some "user-friendly" languages, such as php.
> AF> for example, putting the whole >sendsms URL
> >>into include() function produces the following warnings:
> >>
> >>Warning: main(http://xxx:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?
> >>user=test&pass=testing&to=xxx&from=xxx&udhtext=test&smsc=xxx)
> AF> [function.main]: failed to create stream:
> >>HTTP >request failed! HTTP/1.0 202 Foo in /var/www/xxx/test.php on line 100
> >>
> >>Warning: main() [function.main]: Failed opening
> AF> 'http://xxx:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?
> >>user=test&pass=testing&to=xxx&from=xxx&&text=test&smsc=xxx for inclusion
> >>(include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in /var/www/xxx/test.php on line 100
> >>
> >>if require() is used instead of include(), GET request is passed (SMS is
> AF> sent), but script will die (due to >require() semantics).
> >>
> >>shouldn't be repsonse changed into "normal", i.e. 200?
> >>
> 
> AF> This is PHP fault, it does show that warning for include() or even file()
> AF> function if status code is not 200. But a 202 status is also a valid success
> AF> code, and more accurate in our case. You'll have to use another http client
> AF> for php (Snoopy is a good one for example) or turn warnings off when you
> AF> include() or file() that url.
> 
> AF> You don't know in advance if the message will be delivered (mobile terminal
> AF> switched off for example, and validity expires).
> 
> AF> When a proper bearerbox/smsbox ack/nack handling is implemented, we will be
> AF> able to return failure status codes for some conditions, for example, smsc
> AF> not found and such. But still will have to return 202 when the message is
> AF> delivered to the provider.
> 
> AF> Angel Fradejas
> AF> Mediafusión Espańa, S.A.
> AF> [email protected]
> AF> www.mediafusion.es
> AF> Tel. +34 91 252 32 00
> AF> Fax +34 91 572 27 08
> 
> May be you can use your own writed HTTP protocol handler :) Why Not
> ????
> 
> Just Send Request and Read Response with Resp Codes.
> In php that may be func. fsockopen(), fread(), fwrite(), fclose().
> 
> That you be able to communicate with Kannel (HTTP/1.0 202 OK) :)
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Jury Cherepanov
> System Developer (Technical Director) , HIGH TECHNOLOGIES
> Turaidas 2a, Riga, Latvia
> Phone +371-9633398
> mailto:[email protected]
> 
>