Re: Bearerbox bug?
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wapme Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jarrod Hermer wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have two smsc group connections with the same name in my config file > but each connect to different smscs. > > When I issued a stop-smsc command I expected both to be stopped but only > the one was. Sending the start-smsc command correctly started the smsc. > > If people configure smsc groups with the same name should there be > another identifier when using these kinds of commands? Or should > bearerbox perform the command on all groups with a matching name? AFAIR, when I wrote the start|stop-smsc facilities it was a sequential search in the list of current smscs. So it will break after it found one smsc with the id you provided. This may be addopted to run the whole list and stop|start any smsc-ids that match the id. Votes for changing this? I'm +0 on this. Besides that same smsc-ids are allowed, so semantically they should stop all, right? Stipe [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are