Re: Bearerbox bug?

Nisan Bloch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 04:29 PM 4/26/03 +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:

>On Samstag, April 26, 2003, at 06:32  Uhr, Nisan Bloch wrote:
>
>>At 11:18 PM 4/25/03 +0100, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>>Isn't smsc-id supposed to be unique inside configuration file ?
>>
>>
>>nope..
>>
>>>Why are
>>>we creating a new parameter for an existing one ?
>>>
>>>Can someone show an example where smsc-id is not enough ?
>>
>>What happens when you have multiple connections via bearerbox and some of 
>>these have the same smsc_id in order to group them (eg 2 equivalent 
>>connections to the same provider) and you need to stop and start these 
>>connections via the admin interface?
>
>I think the logical consequence would be to stop/start ALL smsc's with the 
>same name.


yup, i thought of doing that, but then decided to go with the smsc-id-ctrl 
param. I suppose given that smsc-id-ctrl is optional and defaults to 
smsc-id, that we could do a hybrid of the two methods,

nisan


>Andreas Fink
>Global Networks Switzerland AG
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Tel: +41-61-6666333  Fax: +41-61-6666334   Mobile: +41-79-2457333
>Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
>Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/      [email protected]
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Send SMS to +979 979 UNICEF (+979979864233) to donate a
>small amount to the children of Iraq. http://www.gni.ch/unicef
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.