Re: Bearerbox bug?
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wapme Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bruno, > > Isn't smsc-id supposed to be unique inside configuration file ? Why are > we creating a new parameter for an existing one ? no, the smsc-id uniqueness is no-where tested as a constraint. In fact I'd like to add this, so that smsc-ids *are* unique. BTW, it's no argument for people to say "we need doubling smsc-id otherwise we couldn't address multiple links to a logical smsc". you can always load-balance by having a "non-existen" smsc-id within the 'accept-smsc-id' list of the multiple smscs that belong to one. > Can someone show an example where smsc-id is not enough ? it's definetly enough, I dislike *heavily* in adding any aditional config directives here. Stipe [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are