Re: at2 DLR weirdness
Mat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We are connected directly to an operator which is using an SMSC running under OpenVMS. I know that Compaq is providing LogicaCMG SMSC solutions, it may be that... Apparently, the information of what they are running is a bit secret, which is not very surprising. Is it possible to fingerprint an SMSC ? But what is really strange to me is most of time it works fine, and only a few messages are affected. How do you think I should investigate ? Many thanks! Oded Arbel wrote: >On Sunday 20 July 2003 16:12, Mat wrote: > > >>Ok! So if I understand well, I've to spank my operator because he has a >>broken SMSC ? >> >> >Are you using your provider SMSC directly or through some abstraction layer ? >if its the former, then I'd wager we need to probe the issue deeper on >Kannel's side : I learned not to mistrust the major SMSC providers (except >comverse ;-) - its more likely to be our fault. >if its the later, then you most definetly need to spank your operator - I >learned that most operator's internal software departments suck. > > > >>Do you think I can discuss with them if I provide them network message >>IDs of lost messages ? >>Is it easy to make these IDs appear in the kannel logfiles ? >> >> >They appear on the AT2 log after CMGS response. > > >