Re: at2 DLR weirdness

Answers follows...

Oded Arbel wrote:

>On Sunday 20 July 2003 18:47, Mat wrote:
>  
>
>>We are connected directly to an operator which is using an SMSC running
>>under OpenVMS.
>>    
>>
>What protocol do you use to connect
>
EMI4.0


>
>  
>
>>Apparently, the information of what they are running is a bit secret,
>>which is not very
>>surprising. 
>>    
>>
>
>It is to me.
>
After discussing with them, it appears they effectivly use a CMG solution.

>Is it possible to fingerprint an SMSC ? 
>  
>
>
>There are some unique "bugs" and features that can be detected on some SMSCs 
>of some providers. I don't think a comprehensive list has ever been set up.
>I also think that the Kannel project is in a unique situation that allows us 
>to do just that..
>
Great! Maybe the bug tracking system that kannel use could have other 
branch with all SMSC
implemations that we encountered. That could also help to have a map 
with all compatibility issues
reported in...

Mat.