Re: [RFV] late request for voting/vetting for several stuff

Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization Wapme Systems AG
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> 
> I don't think it's a HTTP server problem. I have devices that sends way
> too many headers (more than 30 accepts if I remember) and a Cisco
> "alteon alike" just dropped my connection with those many headers.
> 
> I guess what we are doing now is the right thing. ;)

hmmm, yeah maybe. AFAIR there is no hard limit in RFC2818 (HTTP/1.1)
for *how many* accept headers are allowed to be passed.

> Yep, SE looked at wml-1.1 and POST'ed with appl/x-www-urlencoded. As
> soon as I set wml1.3, it POST's with right appl/mult.form-data.

ahhhhhh.

> >> 2003.07.18 - smsbox - mo-recode now tries to also recode to utf-8 if iso
> >> fails. for external servers, it's easier to process utf8 than ucs2/utf16
> >> (documented)
> >
> > +0.
> 
> This is important to help our "clients", and besides you'll get a nice
> string text in logs instead of a 00xx00xx00xx... ;)

agreed.

> >> 2003.07.20 - broken smsbox compatibility to enable mclass=0..3,
> >> coding=0..2 and pid=0..255. This was already talked about and it's
> >> required to be able to set pid=0 and to be consistent with specification
> >> (it's dificult to explain to someone that for etsi's message class 0 you
> >> need to set kannel's mclass to 1)
> >
> > yep, +1. Did you test all dependencies on this?!
> 
> I've done some tests with at(2) (I was at home), which tested smsbox
> code and sms.c code (fields<->dcs), so it should work with all the
> others.
> SMAPI is using directly sms.mclass and other parameters, but I guess
> I've also fixed  it.

we'll see as soon as we update our production server that run some
SM/ASI links ;)

> >> 2003.07.20 - maintained parameter consistency and always use urlencoding
> >> for udh and binary data in POST headers and in xml. I had several
> >> complains because common sense will make you send url-encode in http
> >> udh header and then you ask yourself why is it not working
> >
> > ??? (didn't get the point. too less coffee this morning? ;))
> 
> in query-string, udh=%xx%yy%zz. In http headers, you use udh=xxyyzz, in
> my xml was more or less undefined (i guess it was xxyyzz). It's better
> to be consistent and always use urlencode. This is easily rollbacked
> (it's two lines) and I'd really like to ear comments about this.

have to check, but in general I'm a fan of consitency ;)

> >> 2003.07.21 - made wap cookies enable per default. Please complain about
> >> what is not working with them so I can fix it. So far, I know, and I'm
> >> working thowards it, that we should try to send cookies to device
> >> (bug 34), that cookies are not checked for domain, path and secure (bug
> >> 64), and that they might not work at all with connectionless wap.
> >> I need cookie support and I'd rather activate it and fix it.
> >
> > +1, we have to work on passing the Cookies in WSP encoding to the
> > device.
> 
> I'm first fixing cookie domain/path support and then I'll do this.

ok.

Stipe

[email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.