Re: problem with CMG and one mutual SEND/RCV connection

Holger Seiferth <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

sorry for the delayed response, I just checked the issue again. From my
point of view your description of the way Kannel works proves my observation.
When you get a DLR then you need to ACK this asap instead of sending MTs first,
because CMG (EMI) seems to be waiting for those responses. I think they have
implemented a way of making sure, a connected application is not overloaded
by traffic from CMG (generally, some kind of window size implementation for
the direction smsc->kannel). So if they don't get ACKs soon enough, they just
delay sending. Which eventually leads to exactly the situation I described.
Of course, you can say this does not go along with the protocol, and I agree
with that, but the problem remains the same. For that reason I didn't call
it a bug (as you might have noticed). It's just that I think the lack of
WindowSize parameter in the receive direction made CMG implement a substitute, and
that's what is causing the problem. (At least, that's what I think.)

Kind regards,
Holger.

> Hi again,
> 
> I do not agree here... We doesn't have any queue for ACK's. If emi driver 
> receive DLR's then ACK's will be send immediately back, without any
> queuing 
> (only tcp/ip buffering is here). That means, the right order is always
> there:
> 	1) kannel -> send msg -> smsc 
> 	2) smsc -> send ack -> kannel
> 	3) smsc -> send dlr -> kannel
> 	3) kannel -> send next msg (depends on window size) -> smsc
> 	4) kannel -> send ack -> smsc
> 
> So I can not undestand, why it should happens here ? If it is happens,
> then 
> (imo) CMG has a bug! emi is asynch. protocol and smsc may not wait for any
> 
> ack's before sending ack's back!
> 
> On Monday 04 August 2003 10:59, Andreas Fink wrote:
> > if this is really the case, then we have a bug to fix.
> > Bruno what you think of this?
> >
> > On Montag, August 4, 2003, at 10:55  Uhr, Holger Seiferth wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > when using kannel with CMG SMSC and a provider which uses one
> > > connection to
> > > do both sending and receiving messages (incl. notification) there
> > > seems to be
> > > a kind of "Dead Lock" problem with sending messages and sending
> > > notifications. Situation is like this (I tried to simplify the
> > > description to make it
> > > easier to understand):
> > > I send 100 messages to Kannel. Kannel puts those 100 messages into its
> > > send
> > > queue. Then it sends out the first 5 messages (assuming WindowsSize is
> > > 5).
> > > Then I get back 5 ACKs and 5 notifications. After I got back the ACKs,
> > > Kannel
> > > sends out the next 5 messages. Then I get back 5 ACKs and 5
> > > notifications, and
> > > so on.
> > > The problem is:
> > > Kannel seems to put the ACKs to the notifications in the same queue as
> > > the
> > > outgoing messages without any priority. So those ACKs are not sent
> > > until the
> > > last of the 100 MOs was sent. But we get into trouble, because the CMG
> > > SMSC
> > > keeps waiting for those ACKs and since they don't come, it's assuming
> > > that our
> > > side (meaning Kannel) is busy, so it delays sending the MT ACKs.
> > > Finally, we get into the situation when Kannel waits for MT ACKs
> > > (because
> > > CMG refuses sending them) and CMG waits for notification ACKs, since
> > > they are
> > > in the Kannel message queue.
> > > I think, to prevent this, Kannel would have to send any ACKs before
> > > sending
> > > any messages, meaning Kannel needs to set a higher priority on ACKs
> > > than on
> > > MTs.
> > > Is there any (configuration) solution for this problem?
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Holger
> > >
> > > --
> > > COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger!
> > > 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualitätssieger!
> > > 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8.
> > > e-Post
> >
> > Andreas Fink
> > Global Networks Switzerland AG
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tel: +41-61-6666333  Fax: +41-61-6666334   Mobile: +41-79-2457333
> > Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
> > Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/      [email protected]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -- 
> Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf
> 
> Dipl.-Ing.
> Alexander Malysh
> ___________________________________________
> 
> Centrium GmbH
> Vogelsanger Weg 80
> 40470 Düsseldorf
> 
> Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
> Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109
> 
> email: a.malysh at centrium.de
> web: www.centrium.de
> msn: olek2002 at hotmail.com
> icq: 98063111
> ___________________________________________
> 
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> 

-- 
COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
--------------------------------------------------
1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger!
2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualitätssieger!
3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.