Re: [RFC] Number portability hooks
Andreas Fink <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Montag, August 11, 2003, at 12:51 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: >> An HTTP 'callback' sounds good as an initial implementation. Generic >> and >> flexible. > > yep. I'm also in a favor of this. Where API should be very simplified > like: > > earerbox calls http://www.foob.com/?msisdn=<msisdn> and that HTTP > server replies with either an smsc-id as body/header(?!) or nothing > (indicating he doesn't know where to route). > > The question is would we do some kind of internal caching for this? > This would speed up things drastically. Maybe using a *huge* Dict > hash? why huge? entries in this list should not be kept too long. an alternate way of API would be to use a MySQL DB directly as secondary solution. But this brings us to a routing issue in general. Andreas Fink Global Networks Switzerland AG ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tel: +41-61-6666333 Fax: +41-61-6666334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/ [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------