Re: UCP 52 behaviour

On Dienstag, August 19, 2003, at 05:01  Uhr, Mat wrote:

> Hi list,
> I was wondering why kannel does not have a callback mechanism so that 
> when an MT
> fails and an NACK is returned after the UCP 52, we can directly update 
> our DB.
> As some operators does not allow notifications (UCP 53), we have to 
> grep/perl/sed
> our logfiles, which can be heavy and intrinsecly inconsitent. The 
> current DLR mechanism
> does that very well, so I'm pretty sure the current code base allow to 
> add this easily.
> We would just have to provide an "mtID" during the call to 
> /cgi-bin/sendsms ,
> which would be reforwarded to an url defined in the config file, or 
> given  as
> an urlencoded parameter to sendsms.
> Did I miss something? Are there any people who implemented such 
> feature?
> Does that feature interrest someone ? If we provide a patch, will it 
> be integrated ?
>

I dont know what your problem is...
if the message is NACK'ed at submission, you get SMSC delivery failed 
report...

Andreas Fink
Global Networks Switzerland AG

------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel: +41-61-6666333  Fax: +41-61-6666334   Mobile: +41-79-2457333
Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/      [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------