RE: WTP Session

Thanks, I realized I overlooked that chapter 10 minutes
after sending the message, sorry.
Marco

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jörg Pommnitz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: venerdì 19 settembre 2003 19.24
> To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
> Subject: AW: WTP Session
>
>
> Page 29, of "WAP-224-WTP-20010710-a, Version 10-Jul-2001"
>
> 7.6. Asynchronous Transactions
> 7.6.1. Motivation
>
> The maximum number of outstanding transactions at any moment is
> limited by the maximum number of Transaction Identifiers. The
> Transaction Identifier is 16 bits, but the high order bit is used
> to indicate the direction of the message, so the maximum number
> of outstanding transactions is 2**15. The implementation environment
> will also set a limit to how many outstanding transactions it
> can handle simultaneously.
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Marco Fassiotto [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. September 2003 17:57
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: WTP Session
>
>
> Hello,
> during my wandering in the kannel code I've noticed that the function
> wtp_event_is_for_responder differentiates whether to dispatch an
> incoming datagram to the WTP initiator or responder based on the
> TID value (if TID < 0x8000 to responder else to initiator).
> I have not found mention to this distinction anywhere in the WAP
> specs concerning the WTP TID, does anybody know where I should look for?
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> --
> Marco Fassiotto
> [email protected]
>