Re: dlr mask question...

Alexander  Malysh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 September 2003 00:50, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>> Alexander  Malysh <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tuesday 16 September 2003 18:25, Bill Brigden wrote:
>> > it's pretty simple ;) You have requested
>> > DLR_SUCCESS+DLR_FAIL+DLR_BUFFERED. So if a msg was rejected from smsc
>> > then it's a end state and handled as DLR_FAIL (which was requested) plus
>> > a bit more ;) you can see: aha smsc has not accepted it...
>>
>> Sorry ???????
>>
>> DLR_FAIL is a failure to deliver to phone
>> DLR_SMSC_FAIL is a failure to deliver to smsc
>>
>> Are you mixing both in the code ?!??!!? I surely hope not.
> 
> You can be sure, I'm not mixing both! But if user requested DLR_FAIL and smsc 
> has rejected this message then DLR_SMSC_FAIL will be generated (also when 
> DLR_SMSC_FAIL flag was not set), because otherwise user will never get 
> DLR_FAIL...

"I'm not mixing both, I'm just mixing both" ;)

First you say that kannel generates a DLR_FAIL back even if you don't
ask for it.
Now you say it generates a DLR_SMSC_FAIL.

Let'me get things straight: kannel SHOULD ONLY generate DLR's for the
ones user asked.

If you send a bad message and only wait for DLR_FAIL, bad luck. You
should always ask for DLR_SMSC_FAIL if you are not sure if your message
is right.

I'm voting -1 for this mix feature